Unusual Histopathologic Findings in Appendectomy Specimens: A Retrospective Analysis

1 Department of Pathology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
*Corresponding author: Kamyab Alizadeh, Department of Pathology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran. Tel: +98-2139954937, Fax: +98-2139954937, E-mail: kamyab_alizadeh@yahoo.com.
Scimetr. 2014 July; 2(3): e18103 , DOI: 10.5812/scimetr.18103
Article Type: Research Article; Received: Feb 8, 2014; Revised: Apr 18, 2014; Accepted: Jun 14, 2014; epub: Jul 20, 2014; ppub: Jul 2014

Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is one of the most common acute conditions of the abdomen. Although, lymphoid hyperplasia and fecalith are the most common etiologic factors, some unusual factors including intestinal worms and tumors have been identified.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and implications of unusual histopathologic findings among appendectomy specimens from patients with clinical impression of acute appendicitis.

Patients and Methods: The clinicopathological data of 2757 patients who had undergone appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis from January 2006 to November 2013 were retrospectively assessed. According to microscopic findings, the patients were classified into six groups: appendix vermiformis, suppurative appendicitis, phlegmonous appendicitis, gangrenous appendicitis, perforated appendicitis, and unusual histopathologic findings.

Results: A total of 2757 appendectomies were performed to treat patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The mean age of patients was 25.4 ± 11.8 years (range, 5-86) and 69.7% were male. There were 1608 suppurative appendicitis (58.3%), 855 appendix vermiform (31%), 99 gangrenous appendicitis (3.6%), 19 perforated appendicitis (0.7%), 19 phlegmonous appendicitis (0.7%), and 157 patients with unusual histopathologic findings (5.7%). The unusual histopathologic findings (n = 157) were contained fibrous obliterated appendix (80.2%), carcinoid tumor (7%), mucocele (3.8%), Enterobius vermicularis (3.8%), B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (B-NHL) (1.9%), eosinophilic infiltration (1.2%), and granulomatous infiltration (1.9%). Histopathologic findings of appendectomy specimens revealed 14 malignancies among 157 unusual findings (8.9%; 0.5% of all appendectomies) including carcinoid tumor (n = 11) and B-NHL (n = 3).

Conclusions: Although unusual pathologic findings in appendectomy specimens are rare, histopathologic assessment will allow early diagnosis of many unusual diseases. Thus, even when the macroscopic appearance of appendectomy specimens is normal, all specimens should be subjected for routine histopathologic examination.

Keywords: Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Pathology

1. Background

Appendicitis is one of the most common acute conditions of the abdomen and appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed emergency surgeries (1). Epidemiologic studies have shown that the incidence of acute appendicitis roughly parallels that of lymphoid development, with the peak incidence between ten and 30 years of age (23). The male to female ratio of acute appendicitis is about equal up to puberty, but at puberty and thereafter, the male to female ratio increases to 2:1 (24). The most important etiologic factor of acute appendicitis is development of luminal obstruction although lymphoid hyperplasia is the most common factor in patients younger than 20 years old and fecalith is the most common factor in the elderly. In addition, some unusual etiologic factors including intestinal worms and tumors (malignant or benign) have been identified (1257). These conditions are rarely associated with clinical manifestation; they are recognized either during an operation or pathological examination of appendectomy specimens (17).

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and implications of unusual histopathologic findings among appendectomy specimens from patients with clinical impression of acute appendicitis.

3. Patients and Methods

Hospital records of 2757 patients who had undergone surgery for presumed acute appendicitis between 2006 and 2013 at Be’sat Educational and Research Hospital in Tehran, Iran, were studied retrospectively with special reference to age, sex, operation report, and histopathologic findings. Patients with incidental appendectomy during the course of an operation for an illness other than appendicitis including gynecological or colorectal cancer surgery, or trauma surgery were excluded from the study. According to microscopic findings in pathology report, the patients were classified into one of the following six groups including: appendix vermiformis, suppurative appendicitis, phlegmonous appendicitis, gangrenous appendicitis, perforated appendicitis, and unusual histopathologic findings.

Two experienced pathologists independently reevaluated slides of patients in the “unusual histopathologic findings” group. The results were analyzed using simple percentage and presented clearly to reflect the type of pathology involved.

4. Results

4.1. General Characteristics of Patients Who Undergone Appendectomy

Totally, 2757 appendectomies were performed to treat suspected acute appendicitis. The mean age of patients was 25.4 ± 11.8 years (range, 5-86). Overall, the majority of patients (87.8%) were ≤ 40 and 1.5% were ≥ 61 years old. The male to female ratio was 2.3:1.0 (males, 69.7%). According to histopathologic reports, there were 1608 suppurative appendicitis (58.3%), 855 appendix vermiform (31%), 99 gangrenous appendicitis (3.6%), 19 perforated appendicitis (0.7%), 19 phlegmonous appendicitis (0.7%), and 157 patients (5.7%) with unusual histopathologic findings. Clinical and histopathologic characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. There was an age tendency towards patients ≤ 40 years old in the vermiform appendix (normal appendix) group (94.1% of the 855 patients). Of all performed appendectomies, 157 specimen revealed abnormal histopathologic diagnoses (5.7%). The mean age of this group of patients was 35.7 ± 16.5 years and the male to female ratio was 1:1.1. The mean age of men and women with abnormal histopathologic diagnoses were 38.5 ± 18.5 (range, 10-76) and 33.2 ± 14.2 years (range, 18-79), respectively.

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of the 2757 Patients Who had Undergone Appendectomy a
4.2. General Characteristics of Patients with Unusual Histopathologic Findings in Appendectomy Specimens

The unusual histopathologic findings (n = 157) were fibrous obliterated appendix (n = 126; 80.2%), carcinoid tumor (n = 11; 7%), mucocele (n = 6; 3.8%), E. vermicularis (n = 6; 3.8%), B-NHL (n = 3; 1.9%), eosinophilic infiltration (n = 2; 1.2%), and granulomatous infiltration (n = 3; 1.9%). Clinicopathologic feature of 157 patients with unusual histopathologic findings are summarized in Table 2. Among 157 patients with unusual histopathologic findings, 127 showed no evidence of inflammatory cells infiltration and the remaining 30 patients showed varying degrees of infiltration.

Table 2.

Characteristics of 157 Patients With Unusual Histopathologic Findings a

Histopathologic findings of appendectomy specimens revealed 14 malignancies among 157 unusual findings (8.9%; 0.5% of all studied appendectomies) including carcinoid tumor (n = 11) and B-NHL (n = 3). All of the patients with carcinoid tumor were only treated with appendectomy and the tumor diameters of these cases ranged from 5 to 13 mm. The patients with B-NHL were referred to the oncology center for further treatment. Detailed characteristics of patients with appendicular malignancy are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Detailed Characteristics of the Patients With Appendicular Malignancy a

5. Discussion

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency and obstruction of the appendiceal lumen seems to be essential for developing appendicitis. Although fecalith and lymphoid hyperplasia are the usual causes of the obstruction, some unusual factors were also reported (289). Appendiceal tumors, which have been reported in less than 3% of all appendectomy specimens, are rarely associated with clinical manifestations. They are frequently recognized either during an operation or the pathological examination (21011). Benign tumors of the appendix consist of tubular adenoma, villous adenomas, leiomyoma, neuromas, and lipomas. Malignant tumors of the appendix include carcinoids, goblet cell carcinoids, lymphomas, primary adenocarcinomas, and mucinous cystadenocarcinomas (21011). The most common appendiceal malignant lesion is carcinoid tumor which comprises about 60% of all appendiceal tumors, but are found in only 0.3% to 2.27% of appendectomies specimens; malignancy and metastasis of these tumors are very rare and are seen only in tumors that exceed 1 cm. Therefore, simple appendectomy is considered sufficient management for these tumors and right hemicolectomy is recommended for tumor ≥ 2 cm (1214). In our study, the incidence of appendiceal carcinoid was 0.39%, which was similar to other studies.

All patients in our study had signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis and diagnosis was made after appendectomy and histopathologic examination. Female preponderance, location in the tip of appendix, and size of less than 1 cm in our study were also similar to other reports (21214). The most common mucinous epithelial neoplasm of the appendix is mucocele. In this condition, mucoid material accumulates in the intraluminal region of the appendix causing abstractive dilation of the organ. The overall incidence of this condition in the literatures ranges from 0.2% to 0.7%. Currently, four histopathologic types of appendiceal mucocele are recognized including (in order of incidence) mucinous cystadenoma, mucosal hyperplasia, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, and retention cyst (138111518). Appendectomy is the standard of care for mucinous cystadenoma, whereas a cystadenocarcinoma requires a right hemicolectomy and consequent chemotherapy (11516). In our patient series, the incidence of appendiceal mucocele (0.2%) was also in accordance with previous reports.

The gastrointestinal tract is the most common site for extranodal lymphomas and accounts for 30% to 43% of all extranodal cases. The stomach is the most commonly involved organ followed by the small intestine, colon, and esophagus (19). The incidence of primary appendiceal lymphoma is extremely low and has been estimated at 0.015% to 0.05% (1922).

Cases of appendiceal lymphoma most often occur in young adults ageing 20 to 40 years. Most of the cases presents with symptoms of acute appendicitis and are found during histopathologic examination (19). In our patient series, the incidence of appendiceal lymphoma (0.1%) was higher than previous reports (2022). The incidence of neurogenic appendicopathy (fibrous obliteration) is estimated at 30%, although this condition is described as fibrous obliteration, recent studies show that the occlusive proliferation is predominantly neurogenic. Differential diagnosis of appendicitis relatively depends upon a patient’s history, symptoms, and findings of laboratory and physical examination (12325). In the current patient series, the incidence of fibrous obliteration was 4.5%, which was lower than the previous reports (2325).

Enterobius vermicularis, also known as pinworm or oxyuris, is a widespread parasitic infection. It is estimated that up to 200 million people are infested with E. vermicularis worldwide. The association of pinworm infection and appendicitis was first made in the late 19th century. While the reported incidence of pinworm in appendectomy specimens of patients suspected for appendicitis ranged from 0.02% to 41.8%, the reported rates of inflammation in infected specimen with pinworm ranged from 13% to 37% (12629). Enterobius vermicularis was found in six cases (0.2%) in the present study and one of them had acute appendicitis on histopathologic examination, which is in accordance with the previous studies (1). Granulomatous appendicitis (GA) is a rare condition that is discovered incidentally in patients with suspected acute appendicitis during histopathologic studies. The incidence ranged from 1.3% to 2.3% in underdeveloped countries and from 0.14% to 0.03% in western countries (13031). Various infectious and noninfectious diseases including Yersinia spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosisSchistosoma spp., Crohn’s disease, and sarcoidosis have been mentioned as causative factor in GA (12932). The incidence rate of GA in this study was 0.8% that was lower than other reports (1253031).

In summary and with considering the overall case reports and case series in the literature, although fecalith and lymphoid hyperplasia are the usual causes of acute appendicitis, some unusual factors such as parasites and tumors may also lead to appendicitis. Thus, even when the macroscopic appearance of appendix is normal, histopathologic assessment of specimens will allow early diagnosis of many unusual diseases that may require further surgery and treatment.

Footnotes

Authors’ Contributions: Katayoun Ziari and Kamyab Alizadeh developed the original idea and the protocol, abstracted and analyzed data, wrote the manuscript, and are guarantor.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by AJA University of Medical Sciences.

References

  • 1. Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(15):1961-70. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2. Polat DA, Munevver M, Selcuk U, MahirM O, VasfiM O, Selda S. Unusual findings in appendectomy specimens: Evaluation of 2458 cases and review of the literature. Indian J Surg . 2004;66:221-6.
  • 3. Machado NO, Chopra P, Pande G. Appendiceal tumour–retrospective clinicopathological analysis. Trop Gastroenterol. 2004;25(1):36-9. [PubMed]
  • 4. Ojo OS, Udeh SC, Odesanmi WO. Review of the histopathological findings in appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Nigerians. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991;36(4):245-8. [PubMed]
  • 5. Hafezi-Ahmadi M, Seifmanesh H. Taeniasis caused appendicitis without local tenderness: A rare case. Hosp Chronicles. 2011;6(4):207-9.
  • 6. Sforza M, Andjelkov K, Zaccheddu R, Ivanov D, Krstic S, Paganelli A. An unusual case of ascariasis of the appendix. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011;139(11-12):809-11. [PubMed]
  • 7. Gialamas E, Papavramidis T, Michalopoulos N, Karayannopoulou G, Cheva A, Vasilaki O, et al. Enterobius vermicularis: a rare cause of appendicitis. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2012;36(1):37-40. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8. Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, Sargen K. The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg. 2007;7:17. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9. Chamisa I. A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91(8):688-92. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10. Bucher P, Mathe Z, Demirag A, Morel P. Appendix tumors in the era of laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(7):1063-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11. Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J. 2010;16(1):12-7. [PubMed]
  • 12. Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, Papa MZ, Zippel DB. Appendiceal carcinoid at a large tertiary center: pathologic findings and long-term follow-up evaluation. Am J Surg. 2011;201(6):805-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13. In’t Hof KH, van der Wal HC, Kazemier G, Lange JF. Carcinoid tumour of the appendix: an analysis of 1,485 consecutive emergency appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(8):1436-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14. Ozer MT, Demirbas S, Celik E, Safali M, Harlak A, Coskun K, et al. Natural behaviour and surgical treatment of appendiceal carcinoids: an analysis of 2,376 consecutive emergency appendectomies. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2011;112(11):619-22. [PubMed]
  • 15. Demetrashvili Z, Chkhaidze M, Khutsishvili K, Topchishvili G, Javakhishvili T, Pipia I, et al. Mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of literature. Int Surg. 2012;97(3):266-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16. Kelemouridou E, Mogrampi SA, Tsavis G, Verroiotou M, Rallis T, Fardellas I. Mucinous cystadenoma of the appendix. A diagnostic dilemma? Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011;106(2):251-4. [PubMed]
  • 17. Graham RP, Williams NP, West KA. Primary epithelial tumours of the appendix in a black population: a review of cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(12):1472-4. [PubMed]
  • 18. Sieren LM, Collins JN, Weireter LJ, Britt RC, Reed SF, Novosel TJ, et al. The incidence of benign and malignant neoplasia presenting as acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2010;76(8):808-11. [PubMed]
  • 19. Ziari K, Alizadeh K, Rahmani O, Kazemi MR. Primary Lymphoma of Appendix: Report of Three Cases and Review of Literature. Iran J Pathol. 2014;9(2):160-8.
  • 20. O’Donnell ME, Badger SA, Beattie GC, Carson J, Garstin WI. Malignant neoplasms of the appendix. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(10):1239-48. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21. Fu TY, Wang JS, Tseng HH. Primary appendiceal lymphoma presenting as perforated acute appendicitis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2004;67(12):629-32. [PubMed]
  • 22. Kitamura Y, Ohta T, Terada T. Primary T-cell non-Hodgkin’s malignant lymphoma of the appendix. Pathol Int. 2000;50(4):313-7. [PubMed]
  • 23. Gupta K, Solanki A, Vasishta RK. Appendiceal neuroma: report of an elusive neuroma. Trop Gastroenterol. 2011;32(4):332-3. [PubMed]
  • 24. Patel AV, Friedman M, MacDermott RP. Crohn’s disease patient with right lower quadrant abdominal pain for 20 years due to an appendiceal neuroma (Fibrous obliteration of the appendix). Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(7):1093-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25. Yilmaz M, Akbulut S, Kutluturk K, Sahin N, Arabaci E, Ara C, et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(25):4015-22. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26. Arca MJ, Gates RL, Groner JI, Hammond S, Caniano DA. Clinical manifestations of appendiceal pinworms in children: an institutional experience and a review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(5):372-5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27. Yildirim S, Nursal TZ, Tarim A, Kayaselcuk F, Noyan T. A rare cause of acute appendicitis: parasitic infection. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(10):757-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28. Aydin O. Incidental parasitic infestations in surgically removed appendices: a retrospective analysis. Diagn Pathol. 2007;2:16. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29. Ariyarathenam AV, Nachimuthu S, Tang TY, Courtney ED, Harris SA, Harris AM. Enterobius vermicularis infestation of the appendix and management at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy: case series and literature review. Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):466-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30. AbdullGaffar B. Granulomatous diseases and granulomas of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18(1):14-20. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31. Tucker ON, Healy V, Jeffers M, Keane FB. Granulomatous appendicitis. Surgeon. 2003;1(5):286-9. [PubMed]
  • 32. Shivakumar P, Shanmugam RP, Mani CS. Idiopathic granulomatous appendicitis: a rare appendicular pseudo tumor. Trop Gastroenterol. 2010;31(2):130-1. [PubMed]